Last updated: March 24, 2024With DJI’s launch of a compact digital FPV system, the lines were drawn. The drone manufacturer was basically saying that digital FPV drone systems were the future and the time for analog systems is done. Other drone manufacturers are still lagging, which is understandable given that DJI has been a market leader for quite some time. However, analog vs digital FPV Drone systems is something that most drone users haven’t made up their minds about. Naturally, the digital variant is still new, so many drone operators haven’t experienced it yet. So should you or shouldn’t you consider moving from analog to digital, and what are the perks of each? Keep reading to find out.
With analog FPV, you get analog video transmission directly from your drone into the controller device so you can see where you’re flying. FPV drones typically use frequency modulation to convey video to the receiving device, typically your goggles. This is where the video data is encoded on an analog signal by varying the data wave frequency in accordance with the modulating signal frequency.
This simply means that variations in the frequency typically reflect the features captured in the image. Once the modulated wave is superimposed onto the carrier wave, the signal is passed to the drone’s video transmitter/VTx.
Drone VTx has a carrier frequency that helps weak FPV signals travel longer distances. Most drones use a 5.8 GHz carrier frequency since it’s less crowded Trusted Source Study of integration 2.4GHz and 5.8GHz in RFID tag The most common, though not the only frequencies generally available for RFID use are LF (nominally 132 kHz), HF (13.56 MHz), UHF (860-960 MHz) and microwave (2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz). www.researchgate.net and can eliminate blind spots in the coverage area.
You can see that in the Holy Stone line of drones. If you’re in the market for such a drone, our list of the best Holy Stone drones may help you out. Notably, 5.8 GHz also transmits data faster than the 2.4 GHz frequency.
However, there are some that use other frequencies, including 1.2, 1.3, and 2.4 GHz, in addition to 900 MHz.
| Pros | Cons |
|
|
With digital FPV, video data is converted into digital signals with the help of an Analog to Digital converter. The resulting files are in the form of 1s and 0s and are compressed before being sent directly to the FPV equipment. This data is sent as a series of pulses where one high voltage represents the 1s, while a low or null voltage represents the 0s.
The receiving module, i.e., the goggles, for instance, has a decoder built into the device to reconvert the 1s and 0s into actual image data. The encoding and decoding at the ends of the transmission are why digital FPV is prone to more lag than its analog counterpart.
The DJI digital FPV system, in particular, is compatible with many DJI drones. As such, if you’re looking for digital FPV drones, you are very likely to find one in our list of the best drones under $2000.
| Pros | Cons |
|
|
Here’s a summary of how analog vs. digital FPV systems compare.
| Analog Systems | Digital Systems | |
| Prices | Low – Average | High |
| Signal-to-Noise Ratio | Medium – High | High |
| Video Transmitter Cost | Low | High |
| Video Receiver Cost | Low – Medium | High |
| Susceptibility to External Noise | Medium – High | Low |
| Form Factor | Nano – Medium | Bulky |
| Range | Medium – High | Low – Medium |
| Latency | Low – Medium | High |
Like everything you consider buying, pricing has a lot to do with whether you ultimately go through with it. Since analog has been around for longer, the cost of making it is cheaper. As such, you can get an analog FPV setup for as little as $100. Reviewers even recommend the EMAX Tinyhawk 2 for beginners since it’s affordable and FPV-ready out of the box.
Digital FPV, on the other hand, is still a fairly new technology, and even with the lag in data transmission, the minimum you can expect to spend is about $600.
The single-to-noise-ratio Trusted Source signal-to-noise ratio (S/N or SNR) In analog and digital communications, a signal-to-noise ratio, often written S/N or SNR, is a measure of the strength of the desired signal relative to background noise (undesired signal). www.techtarget.com indicates the signal strength between the drone and goggles. If the drone is closer to the receiver, you can get a signal ratio of 1. However, the further away it is from the receiver, the more FPV video noise you get from, and the higher noise introduced by obstacles interfering with signal transmission.
Like the other associated equipment, an analog FPV transmitter is significantly cheaper than the digital alternative. However, this may come down with time as more and more companies build digital FPV systems of their own.
Buyers recommend getting the DJI FPV Combo since you get most of what you need for high-quality video transmission in a bundle. This can also help you save on costs.
Where analog vs. digital FPV goggles are concerned, you get various options with the former. This also means pricing varies, and you can get whichever suits your budget best. Depending on your desired quality, you can get one for anywhere between $100 and $600.
With digital goggles, you don’t have much choice since there aren’t many in the market. As such, you can expect to spend $400-$500.
While analog transmission has existed for decades, there’s still no practical solution for avoiding external noise. As such, your videos may dip in quality depending on the amount of noise in the area.
Concerning the form factor, digital FPVs again suffer from being relatively new to the market. As such, manufacturers haven’t found a way to shrink the components as they have with analog FPVs.
This means finding a small analog transmitter is a cakewalk, but if you want a digital transmitter, you can only settle for a large one.
Analog systems, for all their susceptibility to external noise, can provide ranges of over 20km if there aren’t many obstacles around. Initially, digital systems only had a range of 2km, although recent improvements have doubled the range. That said, it’s still a long way to go before they can catch up to analog.
As mentioned above, video transmission in analog FPV is almost instant. The extra steps involved in transmitting digital video mean there’s more latency. Currently, you can get 15 ms latency with analog and 35 ms with digital, although 35 ms isn’t bad enough for most drone pilots to write off the system altogether.
The image quality is one major reason to pick digital FPV drone systems over their analog counterparts. You get much sharper images allowing for a truly immersive flight experience.
Among the DJI drones you can get to fully use the image quality in digital FPV are the DJI Inspire 2 and Phantom 4. If you’re unsure which to pick, our DJI Inspire 2 vs. Phantom 4 comparison can help shed light on the matter.
In the analog vs digital FPV drone systems debate, analog is seemingly a better option. However, digital FPV provides clearer images and is unlikely to be as susceptible to interference as the analog option. Overall, digital FPV is still in the early stages of development, and it may prove a better option in the long run than the alternative. However, currently, analog FPV systems have it beat.
About us
Contact Us
